What bothers me is the zest used in pursuing a wrong point Richard.
Peter was correct in stating that the gross details as well as the nuances will be covered in the data sheet for the variant the Op wants to use. If there is no variant under concideration this is the wrong place for the post.

You Richard are wasting a lot of resources harping this point.
The fact is most of these Topics lack enough information for realistic feedback from here to actually assist the OP.
The best advice that can be given is Study the subject you wish help on and return with a more specific and limited question supported with the details that are needed to solve the problem.

Most of the posts to ambiguous questions are a waste of cyber space and our time as far as helping the OP.
Erics "bible posts " while brusk are usualy valid.
Your concept that we should support the component choices made by the Op has merit BUT should we do so blindly? Is The OP to be denied advice that there may be a better way just to keep you happy?
Post your point let others post as they see fit discuss the merits in the off topic forum or privately .

Craig is there an ignore function available? If not you might concider adding one.

Terry