Where in "the bible" is address decoding discussed in detail?

The OP asked an very general question, and, in a later post, made it abundantly clear that his question was NOT 805x specific.

He humbly presented his question, which was pretty clearly stated, and, rather than being given an answer, he was given what approaches a civil war. He has even apologized for that, and it certainly was not of his creation!

He indicated his willingness to do his own homework, i.e. he asked for pointers to tutorials, not hand-holding, and his query obviously shouldn't have been met with, "You should use the Quadraflibbit 600x13 because it has internal decoding" because it was the process, not the solution that interested him.

Please! Let's give the O/P and, for that matter, everyone asking a question beyond just, "gimme code" or, "do this for me," credit for being more than just a lazy lout. This O/P certainly tried to show us that's not what he is. Sure, his English is not perfect, but he knows that, and that in itself is certainly no excuse to skip over the parts you can't easily understand.

Read the post, and, if you don't understand it, read it again. Normally it's quite obvious what will satisfy the O/P's need. It was certainly obvious in this case.

RE