| ??? 04/01/06 03:00 Read: times |
#113499 - Have a look at this plot Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mahmood said:
Could it be because the AD9835 package is so small, tracks are too close to each other 25 MILS apart and this is why I get cross talk between the tracks and this is the main source of noise? The main remedy to keep the capacitive cross coupling between adjacent copper traces small or even negligible is the use of a solid ground plane directly under the copper traces! To achieve the highest screening efficiency, the distance between the adjacent copper traces should be greater than the distance to the common ground plane. This often demands the use of a multilayer board! The following plot can help to estimate the benefit of a near solid ground plane: 
Many people think, that a ground fill between adjacent copper traces on the same layer is also helpful. But this is only valid, if many many vias connect the ground fill with the solid ground plane. If only a few vias are used, on the other hand, the screening efficiency heavily decreases! Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AD9835 noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recommendations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quick fix? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transmission lines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 5MHz? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spectrum analyser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's ground noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ground noise and groundhogs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Harmonics as well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why separate the analog & digital gnds? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Splitting the ground plane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Evaluation board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thin ground? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is why you use star | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ground wire in parallel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and a twisted pair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Would do! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does not exist, Jan if you used twisted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The clock signal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is there a way... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unfortunately not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| twisted pair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that not obvious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No ground traces, but patches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the bane of many | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why 1 or 2 layers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's nice! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Secrets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DALO 2M professional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UV ink Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mixed method? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Need for DALO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single step mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you want... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dreaming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LAYOUT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100nF caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100nF ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some checks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's my daily job! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unfortunately, no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulate double-layer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seperate Analog and Digital Supply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RLC-filters don't help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| separate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seperate Supplies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Evaluation board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No not that one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Curly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT: Hair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lets have pictures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| http://www.k6ese.com/Mar_Vista_Shack.htm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but it is relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No wonder... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waveforms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link to DDS page | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Add the second stage... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Filter components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sampling theorem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can't find it now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ground of probe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good trick! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I feel strong now! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Funny! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh Dear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NO analog outputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since there is no schematics presented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Publishing failed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then give a link to an ORCAD drawing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Schematics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Big test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try This Schematic... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one more problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I miss the second 300R resistor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminating Resistor. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| University of Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep us informed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eager to know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Autoreload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Current source output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Electronic World Feb 06 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Superb! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No surprise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AD9835 Cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solid Ground Plane Update!!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very nice results! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SLIGHt correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OPA27? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross talk on PCB tracks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have a look at this plot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
further interesting question | 01/01/70 00:00 |