| ??? 03/10/06 21:20 Read: times |
#111929 - Try This Schematic... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mahmood,
Take a look at this: http://www.8052.com/users/trevorjacobs/Dual AD9835 LO-IF V1_1.pdf This is part of a PCB I designed a while back. First, you DO NOT need seperate clocks for the DDS's unless you run them at different frequencies for some reason. Your output network is not going to do the job very well. Take a look at what I did in the schematics. These values have a sharp cuttoff at around 16 MHz and present the correct impedance. You can increase the value of C20,C31 if you need to for higher output at lower frequencies. This was designed for an LF Transceiver ~100KHz to 200 KHz, but will put out a great sinewave up to 15 MHz. Trev |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AD9835 noise problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recommendations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quick fix? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Transmission lines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 5MHz? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spectrum analyser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's ground noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ground noise and groundhogs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Harmonics as well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why separate the analog & digital gnds? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Splitting the ground plane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Evaluation board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thin ground? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is why you use star | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ground wire in parallel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and a twisted pair? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Would do! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| does not exist, Jan if you used twisted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The clock signal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oh well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is there a way... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unfortunately not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| twisted pair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that not obvious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No ground traces, but patches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the bane of many | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why 1 or 2 layers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's nice! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Secrets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DALO 2M professional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UV ink Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mixed method? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Need for DALO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Single step mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you want... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dreaming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LAYOUT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100nF caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 100nF ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some checks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's my daily job! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unfortunately, no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulate double-layer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seperate Analog and Digital Supply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RLC-filters don't help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| separate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Seperate Supplies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Evaluation board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No not that one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Curly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OT: Hair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lets have pictures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| http://www.k6ese.com/Mar_Vista_Shack.htm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but it is relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No wonder... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waveforms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link to DDS page | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Add the second stage... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Filter components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sampling theorem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can't find it now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ground of probe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good trick! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I feel strong now! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Funny! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh Dear | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NO analog outputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| since there is no schematics presented | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Publishing failed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then give a link to an ORCAD drawing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Schematics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Big test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try This Schematic... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one more problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I miss the second 300R resistor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Terminating Resistor. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Answers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| University of Kai | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep us informed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eager to know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Autoreload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Current source output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Electronic World Feb 06 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Superb! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No surprise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AD9835 Cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solid Ground Plane Update!!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very nice results! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Low frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SLIGHt correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OPA27? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cross talk on PCB tracks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have a look at this plot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
further interesting question | 01/01/70 00:00 |