Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/19/06 18:48
Read: times


 
#122637 - Does that suggest anything to you?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Just becuase it seems to work in HIS instance doesn't mean it will always work, now, does it?

If you build the exact manufacturer-recommended circuit, the likelihood is that it will work as the manufacturer intended, notwithstanding all my remarks regarding ATMEL parts.

There isn't any reason why you can't obtain the correct components using a source such as DigiKey, is there? They'll send parts in the mail if you request it. Without a proper programmer, there is little that you can do, so you should probably take the safest, most conservative route to getting a properly functional programmer, perhaps purchasing one, even if it is more costly than building your own.

One thing you should ensure is that a programmer you buy is correctly designed, however. Some of them aren't.

If you had searched the subject before posting your query, you would have noticed that there are MANY posts complaining that this circuit or that, intended as programmers of ATMEL MCU's won't work with this or that ATMEL MCU. This would have given me pause right away. There has been about as much discussion of faulty programmers, both bought and home-built from manufacturers' drawings, as on any other single subject, in my recollection. For that reason, I don't think one should be running the risk that something might not work due to component differences. Arguing on the basis of, "I built this wrong ... why doesn't it work?" is not a good use of time and bandwidth. When you have one that's built correctly and functional, you'll be able to see for yourself why the incorrectly built one doesn't work.

If you intend to build a device from someone else's design, then you should be prepared to follow the directions exactly. If you can't do that, then you should abandon the project and attempt a project for which you are prepared to follow the directions exactly.

RE


List of 53 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
AT89s52 error with programmers            01/01/70 00:00      
   the 'weekly' question get the weekly answer            01/01/70 00:00      
   Add some pull up resistors (4.7K\'s) on LS device.            01/01/70 00:00      
      risque business            01/01/70 00:00      
   Home made JTAG            01/01/70 00:00      
      It is so refreshing to see thing like this instead            01/01/70 00:00      
         Tested!            01/01/70 00:00      
            have you 'tested' that the flash caps are fully            01/01/70 00:00      
               Atmel does that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I think you are wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I don't think so            01/01/70 00:00      
                        yes, and no            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Bah, shoot that designer :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                              not the chip designer            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 JTAG x Flash Data Retention            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    nope            01/01/70 00:00      
   Tnx for answers...!            01/01/70 00:00      
   89s52 programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Only LS chips            01/01/70 00:00      
         there is the mail            01/01/70 00:00      
            here is world´s end            01/01/70 00:00      
               However far it from nowhere, I am sure you have ma            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You can buy here!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     he can do it himself...            01/01/70 00:00      
            What more fast than 9 ns?!            01/01/70 00:00      
               I do not understand. What I said is not to find s            01/01/70 00:00      
         Then stop doing in electronics!            01/01/70 00:00      
   re: AT89S52 error            01/01/70 00:00      
   Somebody test buffer CD4010?            01/01/70 00:00      
      the CD40 is sloooooooow compared to HC            01/01/70 00:00      
         What more fast than 9 ns?!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not the speed is reason only            01/01/70 00:00      
   But and the pull ups in buffer´s out?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Does that suggest anything to you?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Type "74VHC244" into the search window            01/01/70 00:00      
         show the calculations            01/01/70 00:00      
      Schematic of programmer using 74LS244            01/01/70 00:00      
         Circuit that i am using            01/01/70 00:00      
            the very reason            01/01/70 00:00      
               Right...!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  have you conmsidered a 'radical' approach            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RX2...?!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Rx2            01/01/70 00:00      
            Try this one            01/01/70 00:00      
               a full circle            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Time for a decision...            01/01/70 00:00      
               I did it...!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Can\'t you order the parts by mail?            01/01/70 00:00      
      the old STUPID "It is tested"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Gee, another BS answer from Erik.            01/01/70 00:00      
            I can BE QUITE specific about what I post            01/01/70 00:00      
         "tested" does not mean tested            01/01/70 00:00      
            and even then ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List