| ??? 03/27/06 16:38 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#113200 - yes it is SEMA PLEASE REPLY Responding to: ???'s previous message |
just as much as your statement "committed to a particular approach" is speculation
ever so oftedo we get into these "food fights" because of incomplete questions. SEMA PLEASE REPLY WHY do you want to use the 74c922? Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 74C922 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You don't need to know much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 74C922 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm curious, of course, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 74C922 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| whatever you find for the Basic Stamp is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let's not go there ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let's not go there ... as well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't the reason obvious? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where do you get that information from? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's speculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes it is SEMA PLEASE REPLY | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Donner und Blitzen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's EXACTLY what it is, I'll bet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing is everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Difficult to answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| second rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One-off doesn't mean second-rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice to see you almost agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Almost might be an overstatement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 74C922 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We should close this thread,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The noise probably scared him off | 01/01/70 00:00 |