Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/29/06 06:41
Read: times


 
#108626 - OK ... but that's not what the OP wants.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
What the OP wanted was advice on making his "thingie" work, not on how to change its hardware.

At the clock rate he said he was using, it should trivially work in any of a number of ways.

It seems that every time a query of this sort comes up, everybody tells him what OTHER hardware to use, rather than telling him how he might encourage what he wants to use to work. It's like telling the guy who asks the time of day how to build a clock. When you're done, he still doesn't know the time of day.

Now, I don't know why he wants to make the hardware he's chosen work as he wants, but he's the one who's chosen it. Sure, he could make something else work, but it doesn't solve his problem, which is making THIS hardware work. However terrible the 8255 may seem to some of you to be, there have been millions of them, if not tens of millions, successfully implemented, and there's no reason why this shouldn't be workable. The 8155/56 wouldn't work any better, and I mentioned it only because it might have been a bit easier from the hardware standpoint, had he chosen it instead. It's no better than the 8255, and, it, too, doesn't solve his problem, which is making an 805x work with an 8255 at an ultra-slow rate.

RE

List of 55 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
   Clock freq            01/01/70 00:00      
   Reset ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Probe            01/01/70 00:00      
         8255 PROBLEM            01/01/70 00:00      
            Reset 8255            01/01/70 00:00      
   Memory Map            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Scope            01/01/70 00:00      
         8255 address?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Memory Map part 2            01/01/70 00:00      
   isn't this fun            01/01/70 00:00      
      for once, I've got to agree            01/01/70 00:00      
         please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
            8255 - EXTERMINATE!!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Cool            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Some I/O expansion, some nostalgia            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Even Better 74xx573            01/01/70 00:00      
                        or - even better?            01/01/70 00:00      
               more easily said than done            01/01/70 00:00      
                  selling "haystacks" is criminal            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        see ad in EE times            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Hobbyist            01/01/70 00:00      
                              max 7103            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 location            01/01/70 00:00      
                           $13? For what? What pitch, tolerance?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              He's English.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 None, I hope            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Reliable ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Yes, I like 'em too ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Never wire wrapped            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             You don't have to wire-wrap to benefit            01/01/70 00:00      
                              read the ad            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Atmel and Phillips            01/01/70 00:00      
            please help me, why on earth should we            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      for the Philips P89V51Rx2 and the P89C66            01/01/70 00:00      
         Atmel too            01/01/70 00:00      
            Are You Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
               Don't worry            01/01/70 00:00      
   Understand your system            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Please don't answer            01/01/70 00:00      
         What is the clock of your system            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe you should use the 8155?            01/01/70 00:00      
               if it has to be some such thing, then by            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
      never heard of 8155            01/01/70 00:00      
         well ... few of us have heard of it, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            RIOT            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK ... but that's not what the OP wants.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  There is one enormous difference between            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe this will help.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List