Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/28/06 19:35
Read: times


 
#108614 - well ... few of us have heard of it, but
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It's not difficult to read about it if you have some of the 805x-generation databooks.

I don'thave the databook in front of me right now, but IIRC, the 8155 and 8156 are I/O peripherals with RAM, which are directly compatible with Intel's version of the multiplexed address/data bus as was used with the 8085, 8086, 804x, 805x, etc. It differed from the 8255 in that it had direction-programmable I/O similar in a sense to what Motorola put in their 682x devices, along with the internally demuxed bus interface. The difference between the 8155 and 8156 was the sense of the chip select. Since many designers liked using the upper address byte as chip selects in order to save logic, one of each of these devices could be decoded using the same address lines. They'd work fine with as slow a clock as the OP indicated he was using.

RE

List of 55 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
   Clock freq            01/01/70 00:00      
   Reset ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Probe            01/01/70 00:00      
         8255 PROBLEM            01/01/70 00:00      
            Reset 8255            01/01/70 00:00      
   Memory Map            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Scope            01/01/70 00:00      
         8255 address?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Memory Map part 2            01/01/70 00:00      
   isn't this fun            01/01/70 00:00      
      for once, I've got to agree            01/01/70 00:00      
         please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
            8255 - EXTERMINATE!!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Cool            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Some I/O expansion, some nostalgia            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Even Better 74xx573            01/01/70 00:00      
                        or - even better?            01/01/70 00:00      
               more easily said than done            01/01/70 00:00      
                  selling "haystacks" is criminal            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        see ad in EE times            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Hobbyist            01/01/70 00:00      
                              max 7103            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 location            01/01/70 00:00      
                           $13? For what? What pitch, tolerance?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              He's English.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 None, I hope            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Reliable ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Yes, I like 'em too ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Never wire wrapped            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             You don't have to wire-wrap to benefit            01/01/70 00:00      
                              read the ad            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Atmel and Phillips            01/01/70 00:00      
            please help me, why on earth should we            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      for the Philips P89V51Rx2 and the P89C66            01/01/70 00:00      
         Atmel too            01/01/70 00:00      
            Are You Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
               Don't worry            01/01/70 00:00      
   Understand your system            01/01/70 00:00      
   please help me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Please don't answer            01/01/70 00:00      
         What is the clock of your system            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe you should use the 8155?            01/01/70 00:00      
               if it has to be some such thing, then by            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
      never heard of 8155            01/01/70 00:00      
         well ... few of us have heard of it, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            RIOT            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK ... but that's not what the OP wants.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  There is one enormous difference between            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe this will help.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List