| ??? 07/19/06 15:06 Read: times |
#120597 - That's why I... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
That is the problem with FAQs, they will be applied generally, however specific they may be. That's why I don't like, yes sometimes even hate, "examples" or "FAQs": Although well meant, for most applications they don't provide a valid solution, just because the actual application is just a bit different... Erik said:
Thus, e.g. the freewheling diode in a FAQ should not have a type number attached, and either rules for selection or a table of types for various purposes should be provided. Then, why not individualy clear the things with each post? There's no shortcut for discussion and evaluation. Each part is important in a circuit. Each part must be carefully designed, yes, even each single simple stupid copper trace can decide about success or desaster. I know professionals, ok concretely spoken they are no real professionals because of that, who stupidly copy design examples from an application note or datasheet, whithout noticing, that this is only an "example" explaining the function principle, but no real working circuit for an industrial device: No protection circuits, no filtering, no nothing, just the naked chip with parts to make the function principle working. So, they will miserably fail when using it in an industrial environment... Kai |
