??? 02/03/06 09:14 Read: times |
#109040 - sdcc Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Topic | Author | Date |
GNU gcc compiler for 8052 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sdcc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And never will be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmm well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stack Size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is it so because.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
processors supported by gcc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The reason... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bigstack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bigger Stack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how much is enough? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Who? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but who??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
only preprocessor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Successful? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
routinely | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The AVR tinys have no ram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wheel re-invention | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I suppose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sdcc - where to start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No stack required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reentrancy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The right tool for the job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: The right tool for the job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... but who cares, anyway? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sad, but true! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not convincing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
have been designed to fit C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it IS relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not rteally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
choices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
...and Pascal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you are planning to make 1.000.000 un | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Choices | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
naah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yup | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh $8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't buy that one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you have to work with what you get![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Even assembler needs justification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you DID use the %! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as to above | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tradeoffs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd buy Keil if I had to make 2 units | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my original point was... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dan, you missed a detail :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In good company | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
deadlines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
assumptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
could not say it better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing new there, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh well, more words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Normal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
have a look | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but most want their tool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I dont know where to reply! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as so often before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Seen it so many times | 01/01/70 00:00 |