| ??? 02/01/06 00:04 Read: times |
#108848 - I dont' think that's silly, why do you? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Aside from the problem of keeping commercial desktop computers running for that long at a time, I don't think two weeks is particularly long for a system to run a simulation. Often it takes much longer, particularly with fault simulation.
It's much less costly than building the silicon and then trying to get it to run. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Stress testing a synthetic 8051 core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about this one? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test suite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Taa daa!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| although.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| link.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC regression tests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's doing the hard work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how totally worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testbench vs hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you want to get really silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I dont' think that's silly, why do you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test against T51 at www.opencores.org? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Testbenching is the answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just think of this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| we're stress testing an FPGA 805x | 01/01/70 00:00 |