| ??? 01/30/06 13:38 Read: times |
#108709 - just think of this Responding to: ???'s previous message |
do you believe that the test the chip manufacturers (not the FPAG programmers) use are anything but extensive??
now go read the errata for any chip so, how is your "stress" testing going to be complete? I doubt your test budget match that of e.g. Philips. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Stress testing a synthetic 8051 core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about this one? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test suite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Taa daa!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| although.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| link.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC regression tests | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's doing the hard work? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how totally worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testbench vs hardware | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you want to get really silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I dont' think that's silly, why do you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test against T51 at www.opencores.org? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Testbenching is the answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just think of this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| we're stress testing an FPGA 805x | 01/01/70 00:00 |