Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/07/06 18:06
Read: times


 
#111540 - That's the case, sadly ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Because of the larger real estate in the larger chips, it takes the data longer to move around. That's nothing new.

It's just that Toshiba and ST took their 55 ns 1Mx16 parts off the menu. We get into trouble because decisions are made in meetings. The participants are acutely aware that the parts currently available are 45 ns - 90 ns speed parts, because they're using the 29F400's. What they do, then, is base their decisions on the idea that the pin-compatible parts a generation (4x) later, will also be that fast, which, historically has been the case. Unfortunately, that didn't turn out to be true this time.

Now I'm trying to "fix" things. Unfortunately, the same regulatory requirements apply now that applied before, and I can't scab-on an extra set of parts because they won't be approved, and I can't make new boards because there isn't time to get through all the regulatory steps.

RE


List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Has anybody seen FAST FLASH?            01/01/70 00:00      
   nope but then again......            01/01/70 00:00      
      It's not an 805x            01/01/70 00:00      
   external flash as code memory            01/01/70 00:00      
      Fast Flash            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's what I wanted to avoid.            01/01/70 00:00      
         "scabbing-on"            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
               www.sst.com            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Too bad ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      It doesn't take much effort to use 2 MB            01/01/70 00:00      
         apples and oranges            01/01/70 00:00      
   silly me            01/01/70 00:00      
      Nope, not this time            01/01/70 00:00      
   what about            01/01/70 00:00      
      program/erase cycle isn't important            01/01/70 00:00      
         nvSRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
            too little SRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
               serial FLASH parallel SRAM?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  That won't work            01/01/70 00:00      
                     are you desperate enough?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I didn't expect an easy fix.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I used digikey as a "search engine" and            01/01/70 00:00      
                              40MHz bus speed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 big=slow?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    That's the case, sadly ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       could you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Nope ... it's etched in concrete ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List