??? 08/06/07 12:28 Read: times |
#142811 - Another one: Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
... rather than solely addressing the O/P's original question. Andy Neil said:
Take a look at this thread on the Keil forum:
http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread10184.asp It's a classic case where the OP has a flawed approach, and is asking for help to fix a fundamentally broken solution! And here's another one today: http://www.keil.com/forum/doc...p#msg49493 The question asked - "How to fix a function's address" - was very different from the actual requirement; viz, "How to prevent the Linker from using a certain range of addresses?" |