Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/22/07 03:00
Modified:
  03/22/07 03:04

Read: times


 
#135554 - Common mode input voltage range is violated!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Mohamed said:
i make interface to a constant power supply of 15 mv

You forget that the AD7730 expects a bridge configuration being connected to the inputs! This means, that not only a differential voltage must be present between AIN1(+) and AIN1(-), but also a common mode voltage between both these inputs and AGND. So, to provide the inputs with a suited test voltage you must also simulate the common mode voltage of bridge.

You can achieve this by the following procedure:

Connect REF IN(+) and AVDD to DVDD. Connect a 470R resistor from this point to AIN1(+). Connect a 1R resistor from AIN1(+) to AIN1(-). Connect a second 470R resistor from AIN1(-) to AGND. Connect REF IN(-) and AGND to DGND. Mount these parts and connections in closest distance to the AD7730 and route them along the analog side of chip!

If DVDD is now 5.0V, then a common mode voltage of about 2.5V is generated, being well in the allowed common mode input voltage range of AD7730. Also, a differential voltage of about 5.3mV between AIN1(+) and AIN1(-) is produced.

Now, take a look what your AD7730 outputs...

By the way, you haven't omitted the 10µF tantal in parallel to 100nF ceramics at DVDD and AVDD?

Connect a scope probe between REF IN(+) and REF IN(-). If there's the least amount of noise, then REF IN(+) and its "load cell" connection must be low pass filtered!


Kai

List of 80 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Load Cell            01/01/70 00:00      
   24 bits            01/01/70 00:00      
   Load Cells            01/01/70 00:00      
      Alex            01/01/70 00:00      
         Alexandria library            01/01/70 00:00      
         All Wlcome in alex            01/01/70 00:00      
      opamp            01/01/70 00:00      
         re: opAmp            01/01/70 00:00      
            averaging how long? and noamp!            01/01/70 00:00      
            resume            01/01/70 00:00      
               resume opamps            01/01/70 00:00      
                  NO WAY            01/01/70 00:00      
               Already answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Really?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Yes, really!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                           you are fully right            01/01/70 00:00      
                              why use opamp?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Too specific?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    not too specific            01/01/70 00:00      
                           What the hell...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              nothing wrong, just old, dont be angry            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 But, what's wrong with "old"??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    You should know that, Kai            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       shame for me,agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       How incredibly stupid to call a 1982's ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          were it only so well            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             You are sooo right...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Bob Pease            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I religously agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Pease = God?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I should add            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 AC Excitation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    We Became 3 persons            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    AC excitation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       100 nv ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       100 nv ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          100nV            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Weighing lore            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Looks exactly like VLF noise!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             to: Kai Klaas            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Lock-in uses AC excitation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             AC Excitation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Artefacts            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          not 100nV            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             ADCs            01/01/70 00:00      
      probably?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is "hysteresis" specified for your load cell?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why dont you answer my question?            01/01/70 00:00      
         even nastier            01/01/70 00:00      
            Mechanical issues            01/01/70 00:00      
               Mech ?            01/01/70 00:00      
         i thought in that            01/01/70 00:00      
   to stefen and eric            01/01/70 00:00      
      And Load Cell type            01/01/70 00:00      
         send to me datasheet of loadcell            01/01/70 00:00      
   a load of stuff on loadcells            01/01/70 00:00      
   The Author            01/01/70 00:00      
      Variation            01/01/70 00:00      
         11bit from 24 bit            01/01/70 00:00      
         Davids answer woefully incomplete            01/01/70 00:00      
      "constant power supply of 15 mv" ???            01/01/70 00:00      
         kind of that power supply            01/01/70 00:00      
            bad experiment            01/01/70 00:00      
      another experiment            01/01/70 00:00      
         CS5532 comparison            01/01/70 00:00      
            30 kg to 3.5g is NOT 1:100,000 it is 1:8,000            01/01/70 00:00      
               yes and not            01/01/70 00:00      
               Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                  David , what broadband he uses?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  there must be some misunderstanding here            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Simulator            01/01/70 00:00      
                        oh,            01/01/70 00:00      
      You misunderstood something!!            01/01/70 00:00      
         im sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
      Common mode input voltage range is violated!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Please modify your user profile,...            01/01/70 00:00      
      User profile            01/01/70 00:00      
         Haha...            01/01/70 00:00      
      ok I updated my profile            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List