Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
12/20/06 13:41
Read: times


 		 #129820 - do so, but first ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
that's why i am opting the software uart.

do so, but first be aware that with a soft UART most (all?) other things that have ANYTHING to do with timing will not be possible.

Erik

List of 49 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
second serial port            01/01/70 00:00      
   google search            01/01/70 00:00      
   Didn't Search First            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes , you can build your own software port.            01/01/70 00:00      
         No 3 on Jan's List            01/01/70 00:00      
            No 3 on Jan's List            01/01/70 00:00      
   have a look at here also            01/01/70 00:00      
      No 5 on Jan's Previous List            01/01/70 00:00      
   Have you considered 8052?            01/01/70 00:00      
      No 1 on Jan's List!            01/01/70 00:00      
      no problem in using 805x            01/01/70 00:00      
         do so, but first ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I\'d say...            01/01/70 00:00      
               use something            01/01/70 00:00      
                  makes little sense ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No 6 on Jan's List - Why PIC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     makes little sense ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        1) why different architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Sense            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Context            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Question for Ap Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Answer to Andy Neil            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Fair point - so back to OP            01/01/70 00:00      
         Maybe one uArt is enough...            01/01/70 00:00      
   use Atmels            01/01/70 00:00      
      why use Atmel?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Maybe other architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
            why on earth do that            01/01/70 00:00      
               Don't let the pot call the kettle black ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I do not "call the kettle black" except..            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Noted            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I appreciate that Andy            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Erik's error rate            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you must be getting into the Christmas spirit            01/01/70 00:00      
               it's quite easy            01/01/70 00:00      
                  yechhh ... ATMEL (eewwww...)            01/01/70 00:00      
                  8051 -> AVR: not easy !!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     good discussion            01/01/70 00:00      
                        How can you do this            01/01/70 00:00      
                           hand shaking            01/01/70 00:00      
                              no need of handshaking signals            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 you are right            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Not necessarily            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I confirm that            01/01/70 00:00      
         it all depends on what he can both get and afford            01/01/70 00:00      
            The architecture doesn't really matter            01/01/70 00:00      
               architectures            01/01/70 00:00      
                  There are many ways of defining "best"            01/01/70 00:00      
   how true            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List