Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/25/06 06:40
Read: times


 
#114974 - BOMs from schematics
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Oleg Sergeev said:
Well, for example, I have only one SMD resistor (component RES_0805) in my library then I place it on schematic two times and set value of one to 1K0 and 10K for other one. Then I generate BOM file:P-CAD Bill of Materials Untitled.sch

======================================================================

Count ComponentName RefDes PatternName Value
------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------

1 RES_0805 R1 CC0805 1K0
1 RES_0805 R2 CC0805 10K
Could you explain, why do you make "a resistor library with a hundred resistors", please? I cannot catch an idea.


What vendor part number would you use for each of your different resistor values?

While the symbol and the footprint for a 1k 1% 0805 resistor is the same as for a 10k 1% 0805 resistor, the vendor part numbers are not the same.

So while one could easily add a part-number field to the component (the PCAD term for a combined symbol + footprint), and modify that as needed in the same way one modifies the part value (i.e., every time you place a resistor on the schematic), vendor part numbers for resistors (and caps and other things) aren't simple (usually) so having a different component for each value (with a different vendor p/n) can be helpful.

I used to think this was silly, too, but it does simplify downstream processing by purchasing (making sure the right parts are ordered) and production (making sure the right values are in the right bin). Also, some companies have approved parts lists, even for passives, and the part numbers may be some company-special number. In many cases, engineers and layout people are not allowed to add parts to the library or modify part values.

I suppose that for my personal projects, this level of detail probably borders (or crosses right over) the line into anal retentive, but it's really nice when the BOM includes an orderable part number. It's one less thing to screw up when buying parts.

-a



List of 38 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
TSSOP28 footprint for Protel 2.7 PCB            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why not design the footprint yourself?            01/01/70 00:00      
      You want to try it with fricking eagle            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do you like BEagle?            01/01/70 00:00      
            pcad            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, I've got it right here            01/01/70 00:00      
                  FPGA libraries in general            01/01/70 00:00      
            Protel            01/01/70 00:00      
               I'm spoiled            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Protel for DOS            01/01/70 00:00      
            a simple workaround            01/01/70 00:00      
            Eagle            01/01/70 00:00      
               what            01/01/70 00:00      
                  BOMs from schematics            01/01/70 00:00      
                     a good idea with problems            01/01/70 00:00      
                        problems have solutions            01/01/70 00:00      
                           agreed, as I tried to convey            01/01/70 00:00      
            WOW            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, about five IC's            01/01/70 00:00      
                  OK, now it makes sense            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Well, how would you do it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        tell it all when first posting            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Erik, you're doing it again ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              naah            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Well, OK, it's your choice ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I actually consider that a disadvantage            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       It's a matter of preference, perhaps            01/01/70 00:00      
         There are more than one fish in the sea            01/01/70 00:00      
            It's still much too slow to be useful            01/01/70 00:00      
               In the olden days I worked with DOS ORCA            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It's the plague of Windows            01/01/70 00:00      
                     take the bitter with the sweet            01/01/70 00:00      
                     keyboard shortcuts and toolbars            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I've just got to disagree            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Are you in the mood for another?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Nah....no menu's            01/01/70 00:00      
                        that is rarely an option            01/01/70 00:00      
                           it's no better if you're independent            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List