| ??? 07/17/07 15:56 Read: times |
#141981 - maybe, maybe not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
they looked for quick replacement, found the pretty similar SST's 89E/V564/516s, made a deal with SST as per relabelling
since SST (as far as i know) does not have a 89V predecessor, my guess is that this is simply a Crolles2 developemnt. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P89CV51Rx2 XRAM bug? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Ri or @dptr? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @dptr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89v51 <--> P89C51 differences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh sorry I mis-read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the full part No of the C51RB2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89C51RB2BA & internal XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is "the CV51 solution" ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| isp entry on /PSEN - as with the old \'C51Rx2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe, maybe not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89V P89C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CV51 solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the old errors... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, I found the first error in the new datasheet.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| whoever wrote that datasheet... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jan is close! | 01/01/70 00:00 |