Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/14/07 15:33
Modified:
  02/14/07 15:41

Read: times


 
#132919 - put some load on the hardware
Responding to: ???'s previous message
David Lewis said:
I know that to get a required baud rate of 115,000

Actually, it's 115,200 - just for the record.

David Lewis said:
However, although that makes 115k baud possible, how viable is it to actually do any other processing at the same time?

You will receive a character every 160 instruction cycle (so you have around 100 instructions between each character), when running in 12-clock mode. However, note, that the S8253 (although you will get very bad references on this particular chip on this forum) does have a 6-clock ("x2") mode. Note also, that there are many faster '51s on the market today - <shameless advertisement>you might want to have a look at the table of selected fast '51 derivatives at my 8052.com homepage</shameless advertisement>.

David Lewis said:
I need to sit on a very busy 115k multi-drop 485 line, and be able to receive variable length packets, and respond accordingly, whilst also monitoring various other inputs.

Usually, some of the processing can be put onto the hardware. The '51's UART can ignore bytes with the 9th bit unset (assuming the multidrop protocol is designed wisely enough to use this feature). Then the interrupt rate is relatively low; only when a particularly addressed you need to receive a packet - but that might be manageable as it will be only in bursts ocassionally (you'll need to do the maths for your application of course).
Also, you might want to consider using an external UART with an appropriate FIFO, and/or (Erik's favourite) a small slave micro for dedicated processing of the 485 stream.


David Lewis said:
Especially when I plan on doing this in C so cannot optimize the assembly code apart from Keil's creation.
OOoooooh, forget the 12/6-clockers, then... C will eat up your processing time considerably...

JW


List of 68 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Speed Recommendation            01/01/70 00:00      
   Time for processing            01/01/70 00:00      
   Get a 1X Chip            01/01/70 00:00      
      another 485 issue            01/01/70 00:00      
         slightly less            01/01/70 00:00      
            who gives a hoot            01/01/70 00:00      
               maybe yes, maybe not...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Choose the appropriate tool!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Don't have much of a choice!            01/01/70 00:00      
         drop the "coding standards"            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yikes.            01/01/70 00:00      
            down memory lane            01/01/70 00:00      
               a possible compromise...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well...            01/01/70 00:00      
               The other end of the spectrum ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  afer quite a few iterations....            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The guide to writing unmaintainable code says:            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's the kind of nonsense...            01/01/70 00:00      
   put some load on the hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
      Jan, oh Jan            01/01/70 00:00      
      9-bit - more work for the hardware!            01/01/70 00:00      
         true, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            It is...            01/01/70 00:00      
               calculate the ISR after making the ISR skip            01/01/70 00:00      
   Optimizing C            01/01/70 00:00      
      just one example            01/01/70 00:00      
         The advantage is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            If the thinking had preceded the coding ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               you miss the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                  then what's the chance of having him to C-craft?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     zero            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Job security, of course.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Examples are not equivalent            01/01/70 00:00      
         Wasn\'t saying that they were.            01/01/70 00:00      
            I just tried SDCC...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hm, can you post the assembly output ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Keil does this            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Interesting.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Optimizing and Keil/SDCC/Raisonance            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Retort            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Register Banks...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              benchmarks            01/01/70 00:00      
                              tools differ            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Clarification            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    not to write things twice            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       no need            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          And how does this produce two incarnations?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             like this            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                hehe            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   this is no better confusion-wise            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      what is "efficient"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         ok is \'safe\' better?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            How to convey our ideas to the mcu?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Carefull now, you could end with Prolog :)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  my kids            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Huge code != huge time            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               This comes under the heading of "famous last words            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the question I always raise on this            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Here's Why...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SDCC            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks. Also interesting.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SDCC peephole optimiser conflict            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Raisonance            01/01/70 00:00      
   help me ,I NEED SOME HELP ON MY PROJECT            01/01/70 00:00      
      that is NOT 'help'            01/01/70 00:00      
      Well that is not the way to get it!            01/01/70 00:00      
      start a new thread!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List