| ??? 03/06/06 18:21 Read: times |
#111419 - Why not using a fresh ZIF? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
Then, on the other hand, it is somewhat surprising that we have, in the last month, had about 100 entries in 5? threads about Atmel programming and NONE about Philips programming. These threads came from people who tried to build a programmer by their own. The threads handled from mistakes they made, and how fix it. This has nothing to do with the quality of At89S52 itself. Also, it seems to me, that the AT89S52 is sold much oftener than a comparable Philips' micro. So, more interest and more threads. Erik said:
why clean the whole thing before the ID read becomes a nuisance? Why not using a fresh ZIF then? What do you do with the programmed micros? Put them into a socket, or solder them into the board? Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S52 signature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Throw away... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| naah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worse programmer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| different messages, nothing else | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the original problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i tried to explain the whole situatuion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you have an oscilloscope? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be a stupid chip design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make that sense? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it you, Erik Malund? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it seems possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not using a fresh ZIF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the generation using these micros use so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sockets, or how I lost the precision... | 01/01/70 00:00 |