| ??? 03/06/06 16:47 Read: times |
#111399 - Is it you, Erik Malund? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
Cleaning the contacts to a shine result in the signature coming through. You have to clean the contacts?? Well, I wouldn't use neither a micro nor a programmer, where I have to clean the contacts before programming! You are really using micros having contact problems??? Erik said:
The instruction to production here is "if the signature error comes up click ignore" Hello??? Erik said:
Since I can imagine that some kitchen table programmers do not verify after programming... Looks like you use a kitchen table programmer... I never had any problems in reading the signature of my AT89S52. But if so, I would throw away the micro, of course. And I hope that all other professionals do the same?! Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S52 signature | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Throw away... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| naah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worse programmer? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| different messages, nothing else | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the original problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i tried to explain the whole situatuion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you have an oscilloscope? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be a stupid chip design | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make that sense? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it you, Erik Malund? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it seems possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not using a fresh ZIF? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the generation using these micros use so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sockets, or how I lost the precision... | 01/01/70 00:00 |