Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/24/06 13:46
Read: times


 
#108174 - true, but
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I'd agree that they're lacking in personal tutition - my department is a wee bit disorganised. But we're theoretical engineers - system design. Soldering and the like is something we all learnt ourselves when we were 16. The work I'm doing here leans more towards ICs and the like, and this project is not one from the engineering department.

Anyway, enough of that. The algorithm I've developed reduces the problem to a very simple set of commands. It doens't require the image to be buffered, it works on streaming data. Now, it's very possible that the 8051 family will not be up to the task, but without a means of calculating it I just don't know. I guess you get a feel for it eventually.

The 8051 family is the lowest powered device I'm looking at. The reason I decided to investigate it is that it's ubiquous, and would seemingly make a good staring point. Lots of help available, as shown here (8 replies in 24 hours!).

That cheap ARM board looks good but the uC is soldered on. For this application, I'll be intergrating into a PCB design, so I'm looking for the device by itself (which presumably would be cheaper yet..).


List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Starting with uControllers            01/01/70 00:00      
   Phew            01/01/70 00:00      
   starting            01/01/70 00:00      
      yeah, deep water..            01/01/70 00:00      
         And Sarks too!            01/01/70 00:00      
            ARMs not costing an arm & a leg!            01/01/70 00:00      
               true, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                  try a simulation            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Calculation            01/01/70 00:00      
                  More cheap ARMs            01/01/70 00:00      
         bad worker always blames his tools            01/01/70 00:00      
            I could blame "the tools"            01/01/70 00:00      
            Well            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hmm...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Consultants of the world - unite!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well, the way I heard it was ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
   notwithstanding what others have said            01/01/70 00:00      
   For RS232 check this out            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ok, after much learning...            01/01/70 00:00      
      bye            01/01/70 00:00      
      bye            01/01/70 00:00      
         AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
   What are your requirements?            01/01/70 00:00      
   What are your requirements?            01/01/70 00:00      
   guide to microcontroller selection            01/01/70 00:00      
      it would be nice            01/01/70 00:00      
         Direct link            01/01/70 00:00      
         pdf 1.5            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have adobe 6.0 standard            01/01/70 00:00      
               me too, and I had no trouble with it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Upgrade to 7            01/01/70 00:00      
                     upgrade???            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but ... you said you were using v6 ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           where?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              your post on 1/26 says that, doesn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Version ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 got two discussions mixed up            01/01/70 00:00      
                        No way            01/01/70 00:00      
   farnell.com            01/01/70 00:00      
      Farnell            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's like saying they sell parts            01/01/70 00:00      
   You've got to size the task.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List