Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/23/06 13:20
Read: times


 
#108077 - Phew
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Alexander Finch said:
I'm a student who has taken a project that's possibly overly ambitious.


Sounds like it.

The first problem is I can't find it for sale, no one seems to stock the 8051/2.


Cars are just like the model T ford, 4 wheels and an engine, but you can't get model T' s anymore either. The naked 8052 is technically obsolete, we have much better devices now, which derive from the original family, and share the instruction set. The original device was mask programmed in the factory.

One thing I hear is that some models come with RS232 support. I take it this means I can solder my microcontroller onto the final PCB and build myself an RS232 interface directly onto my application?


There is no great difficulty in building an RS232 interface -its only one device. You really want something like the 89C51 from Phillips or the equivalent from Atmel.

A very rough calculation suggests I need a per-instruction execution time of perhaps 100ns - is this feasible?


That depends too much on deep knowledge of the processor, and what you need to do, but devices from Dallas, Si-labs and Philips are quite fast enough.

Steve


List of 43 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Starting with uControllers            01/01/70 00:00      
   Phew            01/01/70 00:00      
   starting            01/01/70 00:00      
      yeah, deep water..            01/01/70 00:00      
         And Sarks too!            01/01/70 00:00      
            ARMs not costing an arm & a leg!            01/01/70 00:00      
               true, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                  try a simulation            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Calculation            01/01/70 00:00      
                  More cheap ARMs            01/01/70 00:00      
         bad worker always blames his tools            01/01/70 00:00      
            I could blame "the tools"            01/01/70 00:00      
            Well            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hmm...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Consultants of the world - unite!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well, the way I heard it was ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
   notwithstanding what others have said            01/01/70 00:00      
   For RS232 check this out            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ok, after much learning...            01/01/70 00:00      
      bye            01/01/70 00:00      
      bye            01/01/70 00:00      
         AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
   What are your requirements?            01/01/70 00:00      
   What are your requirements?            01/01/70 00:00      
   guide to microcontroller selection            01/01/70 00:00      
      it would be nice            01/01/70 00:00      
         Direct link            01/01/70 00:00      
         pdf 1.5            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have adobe 6.0 standard            01/01/70 00:00      
               me too, and I had no trouble with it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Upgrade to 7            01/01/70 00:00      
                     upgrade???            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but ... you said you were using v6 ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           where?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              your post on 1/26 says that, doesn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Version ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 got two discussions mixed up            01/01/70 00:00      
                        No way            01/01/70 00:00      
   farnell.com            01/01/70 00:00      
      Farnell            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's like saying they sell parts            01/01/70 00:00      
   You've got to size the task.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List