| ??? 01/08/10 08:13 Read: times |
#172253 - A bit harsh - but I'd tend to agree! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Scot Satre said:
My sense of curiousity was too much. I just had to reverse-engineer the 8052. It's a good feeling to now understand how the 8052 works. Jez Smith said:
Rubbish.. your schematic is almost entirely useless and as far as understanding how the processor works it is completely useless. Maybe a bit harsh - but I'd tend to agree! Unless you've actually taken the lid off an 8051 chip and microscopically examined it, how can you be sure that this is the actual gate-level implementation within the chip? Otherwise, it's just one possible model of how it could have been implemented, surely? Jez Smith said:
Sorry but this has really annoyed me. Ya don't say!! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Gate-level schematic for an 8052 Microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Er.. no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bit harsh - but I'd tend to agree! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit harsh, and not entirely correct, either | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice link, by the way... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well...you see Richard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as for my 8052 core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| These things happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I can see it being a bit annoying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is there a way to edit my initial post? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mr Boole does it far better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Contradiction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| History about my 8052 schematics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It might amuse you to know ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But... | 01/01/70 00:00 |