| ??? 01/08/10 07:32 Modified: 01/08/10 07:43 Read: times |
#172251 - Er.. no Responding to: ???'s previous message |
My sense of curiousity was too much. I just had to reverse-engineer the 8052. It's a good feeling to now understand how the 8052 works.
Rubbish.. your schematic is almost entirely useless and as far as understanding how the processor works it is completely useless. A, Its you touting for buisness and B, Having developed a VHDL version of the 8052 myself I hope that this shows what is wrong with the idea that you can show how a complex system such as the 8052 'works' by showing a gate level schematic. Also I cannot help noticing that your schemtic contains combinatorial feedback loops which you would never find in any real world design. Also if I want to see any of my designs at gatelevel I simply plug the VHDL into my synthesis tool and it will show me a gate level schematic if I want which might be usefull to resolve timing issues but that's about it. Sorry but this has really annoyed me. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Gate-level schematic for an 8052 Microcontroller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Er.. no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bit harsh - but I'd tend to agree! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a bit harsh, and not entirely correct, either | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Indeed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice link, by the way... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well...you see Richard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as for my 8052 core | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| These things happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I can see it being a bit annoying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is there a way to edit my initial post? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mr Boole does it far better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Contradiction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| History about my 8052 schematics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It might amuse you to know ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But... | 01/01/70 00:00 |