??? 11/21/06 18:22 Read: times |
#128379 - I'd disagree on this one... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
The whole (s)printf etc complex is so 'universal' that it is a true hog. Unless you are doing things that the '51 was never intended for this whole overly general set has no purpose. In programming/electronics - as well as in business and love - everything is allowed. I tried (xy)printf and found it quite adequate and convenient for quick'n'dirty debug printouts and similar. Of course, if it would go to a multimillion pieces project, I'd weigh the bits and bytes more carefully :-) JW |