| ??? 03/10/06 13:57 Read: times |
#111888 - Ok Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
no Atmel beating here, I am sure that the cost/speed ratio is fine. I just wanted to point out that if a "scream" was what you wanted you could get a louder one. Then I say "sorry". Erik said:
Kai, just curious. With you being German, did you come to Atmel as Atmel or via Telefunken/Temic. Well, here in Germany Philips and Atmel are easily available and low cost. Unfortunately we have had a bad experience with Philips in the past and so we went to use Atmel. We had no bad experience with Atmel up to now, ok the support is a mess, but the mature products work reliable. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89Sxxxx with X2 - max.freq | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more like a whisper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why always... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no Atmel beating here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mature? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| various cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C5115 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more timers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| > Got a feedback from Atmel now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be patient I`ll report | 01/01/70 00:00 |