| ??? 03/10/06 13:37 Read: times |
#111883 - no Atmel beating here Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Why always beating Atmel, Erik?
no Atmel beating here, I am sure that the cost/speed ratio is fine. I just wanted to point out that if a "scream" was what you wanted you could get a louder one. Yes you get what you pay for, but if 20MHz is all you need, then $2 sounds good for those that want to use that brand. Now you can mention again no Atmel beating here, I did not. Kai, just curious. With you being German, did you come to Atmel as Atmel or via Telefunken/Temic. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89Sxxxx with X2 - max.freq | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more like a whisper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why always... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no Atmel beating here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mature? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| various cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C5115 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more timers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| > Got a feedback from Atmel now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be patient I`ll report | 01/01/70 00:00 |