| ??? 03/10/06 13:27 Modified: 03/10/06 13:27 Read: times |
#111879 - Why always... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
so, the Atmel is a low cost "scream", you get what you pay for. ...beating Atmel, Erik? Atmel was the one who considerably improved the FLASH memory technology and combined it with the 80C51 core to a very low price. AT89C51 was a megaseller! Now, we are here talking in this thread about a new chip, which is so new, that only a preliminary datasheet exists. Now you can mention that this is not a good idea to sell chips, which are not mature. But this is also doing Philips and many many others. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89Sxxxx with X2 - max.freq | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more like a whisper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not for under $2 in low quantities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why always... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no Atmel beating here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mature? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| various cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE:AT89S8253 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C5115 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more timers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| > Got a feedback from Atmel now? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
be patient I`ll report | 01/01/70 00:00 |