Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/21/06 20:39
Read: times


 		 #110440 - If that's true, then something's broken
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Since you can get within the required limits with 12 MHz and T2, you don't need to worry about reliability. Async starts over with each start bit. Besides, the typical 805x is a >24 MHz part nowadays, isn't it? You can get really close with that rate.

With 11-bit async, it doesn't matter how "close" you are, and it doesn't help being "closer" so long as you're within the specified limits, which will ensure that, with mid-bit sampling, the receiver will not shift enough with respect to the transmitter to cross a bit-boundary. With a start-bit, 8 data bits, parity, and a stop bit, that means 1/20 (5%) of a bit is the maximum, right? The stop bit doesn't matter, nor does its number, so there can be one or two, or more. If you have no parity or only seven bits, then the margin is wider.

RE




List of 90 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
does anybody use those "low" baud rates?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I think            01/01/70 00:00      
      I use even low            01/01/70 00:00      
      but I want REAL information            01/01/70 00:00      
   OBDII            01/01/70 00:00      
      Interesting ... Was that standard ASYNC            01/01/70 00:00      
         srry here is the full story            01/01/70 00:00      
   Water level            01/01/70 00:00      
      Is that in ASYNC format?            01/01/70 00:00      
         why not 11.0592/22.1184MHz?            01/01/70 00:00      
            serial timing isn't always as important            01/01/70 00:00      
               comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well ... that's not entirely true ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     precise???            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Inconvenience            01/01/70 00:00      
                           IF there's another way ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              forget mode 0, im that mode there is no            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Not the ones I see ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              again, why not 11.0592 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 if you don't like the 11.0592MHz...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Well, if they do 24, why not use that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I see your point, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Do I miss something??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Excitement? I'm not excited ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          why do you keep stating "sacred", it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Right Erik !            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                It's because of the purpose            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   And if that is out of the question use            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Still none the wiser            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             it's that ASR33 rate that bugs me ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                not the statements, the "universalism"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Re: not the statements, the "universalis            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Yes, as I said, it's convenient ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         if you use (as you yourself state to pre            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            It's been shown            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Of course it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  It's hard to argue ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     Then buy it, or even better, have one on            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        I'll buy 'em when there IS such a thing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           misapplied economy            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              The $2 board was fully assembled            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 again you talk about oranges            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Because reliability !            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  Seems interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     only 24Mhz can be get            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        True, for sure,            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     apples and oranges            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        If that's true, then something's broken            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           a slight correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              You're right, of course,            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 actually you did            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              further correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 That's up to you ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                    I do not know where you get that impress            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                       One thing at a time ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                          no            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                             so you talk to that stuff directly            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                                as to "what I do"            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's not quite true ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         8048?            01/01/70 00:00      
            You're right, it's not            01/01/70 00:00      
               have a look            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It's not obvious what you mean, Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                     no, not that            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Close, perhaps, but no cigar ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           SPI rather than I2C            01/01/70 00:00      
                              the full story            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I2C, SPI, parallel, whatever            01/01/70 00:00      
                           poll a bit            01/01/70 00:00      
               '51 descendant of 8042            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The one on the KEIL page is too big ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     CPLD            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I did sumfin like that            01/01/70 00:00      
   Specialist transmission only            01/01/70 00:00      
   EVA-DTS over DDCMP            01/01/70 00:00      
      simulator Fun            01/01/70 00:00      
   A "Why" for low speed modems            01/01/70 00:00      
   Low baud rate            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bill Acceptors            01/01/70 00:00      
      well ... clearly there are some places            01/01/70 00:00      
   doesn't ring true ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      which one?            01/01/70 00:00      
         here:            01/01/70 00:00      
            oh no            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK ... no big deal            01/01/70 00:00      
                  YES!, I would not even dream of driving            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Well, I did that            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not every application can "take a pause"            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Believe it or not, I agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              wow            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List