does anybody use those "low" baud rates? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I think | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I use even low | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
but I want REAL information | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
OBDII | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Interesting ... Was that standard ASYNC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
srry here is the full story | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Water level | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Is that in ASYNC format? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
why not 11.0592/22.1184MHz? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
serial timing isn't always as important | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
comments | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well ... that's not entirely true ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
precise??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Inconvenience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
IF there's another way ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
forget mode 0, im that mode there is no | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not the ones I see ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
again, why not 11.0592 ? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if you don't like the 11.0592MHz... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, if they do 24, why not use that? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I see your point, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Do I miss something?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Excitement? I'm not excited ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
why do you keep stating "sacred", it is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Right Erik ! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's because of the purpose | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
And if that is out of the question use | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Still none the wiser | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's that ASR33 rate that bugs me ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not the statements, the "universalism" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Re: not the statements, the "universalis | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, as I said, it's convenient ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if you use (as you yourself state to pre | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's been shown | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Of course it is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's hard to argue ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Then buy it, or even better, have one on | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'll buy 'em when there IS such a thing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
misapplied economy | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The $2 board was fully assembled | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
again you talk about oranges | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Because reliability ! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Seems interesting ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
only 24Mhz can be get | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
True, for sure, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
apples and oranges | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If that's true, then something's broken | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a slight correction | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You're right, of course, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
actually you did | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
further correction | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's up to you ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I do not know where you get that impress | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
One thing at a time ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
so you talk to that stuff directly | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
as to "what I do" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's not quite true ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
8048? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You're right, it's not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
have a look | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's not obvious what you mean, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no, not that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Close, perhaps, but no cigar ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SPI rather than I2C | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the full story | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I2C, SPI, parallel, whatever | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
poll a bit | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
'51 descendant of 8042 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The one on the KEIL page is too big ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
CPLD | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I did sumfin like that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Specialist transmission only | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
EVA-DTS over DDCMP | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
simulator Fun | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
A "Why" for low speed modems | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Low baud rate | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Bill Acceptors | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well ... clearly there are some places | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
doesn't ring true ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
which one? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
here: | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
oh no | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
OK ... no big deal | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
YES!, I would not even dream of driving | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, I did that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not every application can "take a pause" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Believe it or not, I agree ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
wow | | 01/01/70 00:00 |