| ??? 06/20/05 13:42 Read: times |
#95353 - Thanks, but no thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks, but no thanks.
I really appreciate what came out here, but I have not seen anything that would make me jump upon the wagon. I do manage with a 50 MHz f126 to scrape by and the knowledge that the same chip exist in a 100 MHz version (F122) is a great safety net. My interest expreseed in this thread comes from the fact that the function that run the closest to being too slow could, relatively easy, be implemented in a CPLD. Of course, since the f126, can (just barely) handle it, it would not be economically justifiable to add a CPLD, but if I could get a F126 and a CPLD in the same package for the f126 price I definitely would consider it. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ASIC '51s and speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Zylogic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| probably not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not look.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Details please? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| T51 limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| t51 limitations,not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so running from RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TCL and all that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other case, probabl same answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very interesting! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advantages of single-chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Final thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better one superfast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pitfall? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multi cpu pitfalls | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware delegation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2 questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why are you obsesed with zylogic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Obsessed? moi! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks, but no thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uPSD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry, no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FYI - Hitex 8051 SoC kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nice, will check | 01/01/70 00:00 |