| ??? 10/05/07 10:56 Read: times |
#145455 - you are right ! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You are certainly right ! They are talking about the initial programming with a stopped counter.
Thanks Testing that is not so easy because of all these 'could' and 'may'. If I don't get IT that does not prove I'll never get it. BTW, I don't find the PCA being very efficient to use. When I have to program a delay (with a running forever counter) it takes lots of time to do it. And I have to disable IT's during this time, otherwise I could miss the event and wait for a whole counter's cycle. I would prefer to have 5 counters making an event on overflow, like Timers 0-2. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Atmel PCA: CCAPnL/H must be non zero, why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the PCA cookbook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel cookbook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I interpret | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are right ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I like to be... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| engines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what is ML4.1 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ML4.1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ML4.1, more | 01/01/70 00:00 |