??? 10/04/07 14:34 Read: times |
#145386 - Intel cookbook Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks Erik.
I've already read this AN (I found an old message with this doc as reference). The Intel PCA looks similar but they don't talk about this limitation. Their code never cares about the CCAPnL/H value. I remember having read a c552 spec (I have it at home). Their PCA is different from the Atmel's one. However I believe they have the same limitation as Atmel. Alexis |
Topic | Author | Date |
Atmel PCA: CCAPnL/H must be non zero, why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the PCA cookbook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Intel cookbook | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What I interpret | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you are right ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I like to be... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
engines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is ML4.1 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ML4.1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ML4.1, more![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |