??? 09/10/07 08:19 Read: times |
#144241 - actually Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Russell Bull said:
Silicon Labs make the chip not the 'c' compiler! But they (like many chip manufacturers) do supply a set of supporting software tools that are (more-or-less) tailored to their specific products...! Naing Linn said:
they developed the software called silicon laboratories... and it's included the compiler... Actually, I think what they developed is the IDE - I think you'll find that they do use the Keil compiler, etc, within that. Whether they've re-written the Manuals specifically, I don't know. so it's easier to write the program, compile and download to the board.... True, it can be easier to use a package that's specifically tailored (and supported?) by the manufacturer to their particular product. Of course, if you are using the SiLabs tools, you should be directing your questions direct to SiLabs! I think Erik recommends the SiLabs tools for downloading & begugging...? |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 in C programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read the manual! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not in Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
an old IAR compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is there any fundamental problem... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The C language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
structures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Non Standard Extension | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just don't use it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Similar problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read The Manual (sometimes abbreviated to RTFM)! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
silicon laboratories | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
actually | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Aside: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are using Keil! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Learn to walk first! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FYP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
12 Weeks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in parts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's what I said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
(As) I Understand It (now) ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Misreading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No problem :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the beauty of posting twice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
include | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
probably best not to... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Textbook time! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
undefined identifier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
typedefs of types for shorthand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shorthand vs. Portability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The concise C spec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Plus plus | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another one - Certainty! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then, define your stdstdint.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
shorthand can be VERY useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hi...back | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFM! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Two books you need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no book in hand yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You need those books! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:P | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In glorious technicolor... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Back to K&R | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... but if you put it into the context of a... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cool Colors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what about the other '51/mcu Cs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pedantic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ya.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
higher resolution ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ADC fundamentals | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hi-Res ADC is pointless with poor input circuitry! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
4 bits! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time for a new thread! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
xdata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re-post the code & fully describe the situation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Block Comment style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
codes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
analog input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Noob doc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
there is no such thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Already covered | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy, I'm amazed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The link works | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PDF Document | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
program added | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm not sure what you're asking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Post your code properly! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why read twice? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
how? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Accessing arrays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
some hints | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sfr16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re SFR16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Naing Linn really needs to learn to do it himsel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8 to 16 bit | 01/01/70 00:00 |