??? 11/10/06 12:53 Modified: 11/10/06 13:25 Read: times |
#127705 - if overvoltage crowbars Responding to: ???'s previous message |
instead of blowing fuse ,which needs replacements
It should blow a fuse, because you need to know if overvoltage happens you have these possibilities 1) your design is wrong 2) something else is wrong 3) a component failed should there not be 'attention' in either case. Making the overvoltage crowbar a design feature rather than "protection against ripple effects of a failure" is one of the most obnoxious applications of electronics I can imagine. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Absolute maximum Rating .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It doesnt really work like that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It can withstand it for exactly 347msec! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It can withstand it for exactly 347msec! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More details needed about your crowbar circuit! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More details needed ......... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Crowbar SCR, trip time of fuse... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a fun story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oscillate and switch-on and -off | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is protection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if overvoltage crowbars![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Part Damage from high voltage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is all this about a crowbar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What is all this about switchers, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it is that as | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stay away from building switchers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, switch mode power supplies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes and no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It heavily depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
POWER SUPLIES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Plinio Babo, why no (protected) e-mail in your pr | 01/01/70 00:00 |