| ??? 03/07/06 13:16 Read: times |
#111496 - Wonderful, this is great Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kai said
It's a mess, that we daily suffer here from people refusing to give us all relevant details to only simply understand, what they intend to do. So, we are blindly guessing and guessing most of the time... We should change the froum rules: A poster, who gets at least three times the vote "Insufficient" per post, should see his thread being closed bravo, bravissimo. Erik PS a small problem 1) ther is no vote "insufficient" 20 often the request for more info comes from one responder and 4 days between votes, the discussion can run blib=nd for 12 days before the above happens |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bit by Bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about the full story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to Convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wotisit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Async? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer is in the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not INNER working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this REALLY smells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse-engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more likely a disassembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Illegal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the disassembled chip most likely read c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wonderful, this is great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Up one level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| already said? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synchronously or asynchronously? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If it keeps you happy... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I give up! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai, how stupid we are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I want an electrified keyboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez, don't you get it TO ALL NEWBIES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm touched! | 01/01/70 00:00 |