| ??? 03/06/06 15:44 Read: times |
#111379 - good start Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... but you need to ensure the timing will work. Note there is a HUGE difference in timing of '51 and AVR instructions...
Andy already gave you the answer for how to continue. Read his post carefully. JW PS. Please read Jon's document especially the code formatting section. PS2: Caveat, the startbit gets shifted in, so it is a 7-bit UART. PS3.: Can't you answer Erik's questions and tell us what are you doing? Don't be shy, we already know it is reverse engineering. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bit by Bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about the full story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to Convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wotisit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Async? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer is in the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not INNER working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this REALLY smells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse-engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more likely a disassembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Illegal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the disassembled chip most likely read c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wonderful, this is great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Up one level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| already said? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synchronously or asynchronously? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If it keeps you happy... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I give up! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai, how stupid we are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I want an electrified keyboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez, don't you get it TO ALL NEWBIES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm touched! | 01/01/70 00:00 |