| ??? 03/06/06 16:33 Modified: 03/06/06 16:34 Read: times |
#111394 - more likely a disassembly Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Given the thoroughly meaningful label names in the code, like "avr01F4", it looks like it's reverse-engineering some compiler's output...?
more likely a disassembly. If indeed that is the case we are most likely supporting an unlawful activity. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bit by Bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about the full story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to Convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wotisit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Async? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer is in the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not INNER working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this REALLY smells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse-engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more likely a disassembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Illegal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the disassembled chip most likely read c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wonderful, this is great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Up one level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| already said? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synchronously or asynchronously? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If it keeps you happy... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I give up! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai, how stupid we are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I want an electrified keyboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez, don't you get it TO ALL NEWBIES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm touched! | 01/01/70 00:00 |