| ??? 03/06/06 17:45 Read: times |
#111411 - the disassembled chip most likely read c Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Even if this is a disassembly, reverse engineering it AND moving it to a different processor by re-writing isn't likely to be illegal is it ? Of course under the "DMCA" it might be.
The disassembled chip most likely read copyright (c) somewhere, that should say something. To the best of my understanding, "reverse engineering" is legal if you look at the "outer" workings and illegal if you look at the "inner" workings. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bit by Bit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how about the full story | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Then convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to Convert it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wotisit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard Async? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS232? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer is in the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not INNER working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this REALLY smells | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse-engineering | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more likely a disassembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Illegal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the disassembled chip most likely read c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insufficient! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wonderful, this is great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Up one level | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| already said? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Synchronously or asynchronously? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If it keeps you happy... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I give up! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai, how stupid we are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I want an electrified keyboard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez, don't you get it TO ALL NEWBIES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm touched! | 01/01/70 00:00 |