| ??? 03/06/06 14:19 Read: times |
#111365 - How true for "real C" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
C is no fun unless its completely unreadable for anyone except the person who wrote it ;-)
How true for "real C" (I once fired a person for sticking to "this is not real C" when asked to comment a pie=ce of code). HOWEVER, a few of us actually do, at least attempt to, write understandfable C. I have the notion that most who came to C through extensive assembler writes (somewhat) understandable C, whereas those that wrote C from the beginning tend to write "real C". I know this is impossible beacuse of the time factor, but I would love it, if every student were required to write a, say, 1000 line program which then was locked away for 5 years and their graduation would depend on them explaining it when retrieved from the vault. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt driven serial: RFC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It must be perfect! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't believe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Validation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well ... I've looked at it ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| request for comment on comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let's take this a little at a time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK then give yours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Original | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on byte buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coloring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| html syntax colouring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah but thats the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How true for "real C" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excellent idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asm, in the same style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This may not work well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How? | 01/01/70 00:00 |