| ??? 03/05/06 16:20 Modified: 03/05/06 16:24 Read: times |
#111299 - to C or not to C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez,
thanks for the example, Jon could perhaps include a C-example, but... As I said above, the value of the examples lies in the comments - and this one is not too extensively commented, is it? Also, it contains the typical C-ish showoff, like: rbuf [(rpos+rcnt++) % RBUFLEN]
if (busy = xcnt) { /* Assignment, _not_ comparison! */ which makes its value as a comprehensible example questionable, especially for those who are newbies generally - it means, both in C and in '51.
However, it could be cleaned up and commented so if you or anybody else would like to do that part... Jan Waclawek PS. Richard, please note, this IS C and still no putch/getch... :-) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt driven serial: RFC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It must be perfect! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't believe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Validation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well ... I've looked at it ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| request for comment on comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let's take this a little at a time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK then give yours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Original | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on byte buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coloring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| html syntax colouring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah but thats the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How true for "real C" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excellent idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asm, in the same style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This may not work well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How? | 01/01/70 00:00 |