| ??? 03/05/06 16:17 Read: times |
#111298 - on byte buffer Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I suspect there are more examples on interrupt-driven serial, so if something useful turns up, it's just better for the thing.
But, Intel (the author of the exmaple) itself admits it is not terribly useful in this form: SERIO1_I.A51 said:
; A practical program would use a receive
; buffer large enough to hold received characters without danger of overflow ; before being serviced, and a transmit buffer large enough to hold the ; largest string to be sent, or some other buffering scheme, like perhaps ; a queue of pointers to constant strings and/or string buffers. ; Anyway, I think Jon could include the link at least into his document, at least for historical reasons. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt driven serial: RFC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It must be perfect! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't believe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Validation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well ... I've looked at it ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| request for comment on comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let's take this a little at a time ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK then give yours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Original | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on byte buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| c version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Coloring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| html syntax colouring | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah but thats the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How true for "real C" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excellent idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asm, in the same style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This may not work well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How? | 01/01/70 00:00 |