| ??? 02/22/06 19:28 Read: times |
#110527 - any old UNIX guys? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Absolutely. It really bugs me that this particular assembler is using the OBJ extension completely out of normal context
I am definitely pseudo-annoyed as well With "common syntax based on the UNIX system V assembler syntax" what is the meaning of .obj in "UNIX system V" Things change I know linux is supposed to be the same, but since this is dated 10+ years ago, "UNIX system V" recollections only, please Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Using obj files for programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| most probably | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A51 details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is usually the case when you own an | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PseudoSam Assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Throw it away! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Psuedo-Sam | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep what you got. It's very good. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not "WRONG" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where I was wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Back to the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| obj files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hex bloat and Swiss Army Knives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| File size vs Code size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| any old UNIX guys? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OBJ context | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| from here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link to documentation for A51.EXE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| From the manual... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How very amazing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that link | 01/01/70 00:00 |