| ??? 01/27/06 17:16 Read: times |
#108537 - here I do not agree Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Nothing about simulation in this post, but a comment on a paragraph in Richards post.
Today, it takes weeks of late nights using the Windows-based tools to generate schematics that take less than half a day using the DOS-based tools. I have, at times, used ORCAD from the first primitive versions to the current release. While it is true that for every version of ORCAD something get a bit more difficult, usually something else get a bit easier. I can not recall any ORCAD development that (except for "retraining") made more than a 10% change in productivity one way or another. Hardly weeks vs half a day. Richard, could you elaborate on what detail of ORCAD made you make the above statement. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| orcad and at89c52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other easier options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which OrCAD tool? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simulations??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sounds like you need an emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it seems not an emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| effort | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's the popular approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here I do not agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ahhh ... my favorite subject ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ORCAD libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |