| ??? 05/11/07 16:59 Read: times |
#139071 - confusing ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
He shows the 4-NAND version in http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=139033.
I've always considered that the "right" way to show it. Where do you suppose he's gotten that "6-gate" version, and why do you suppose he thinks it's relevant? RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| XOR using NAND | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Implemented in what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its just self study.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as I said REDRAW IT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do the algebra! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Got That. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For Future Reference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Back-to-Basics: DeMorgan's Theorem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is all obvious, aside from the missing detail | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Detail provided | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| confusing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can see that, I guess. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, easily conceivable... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there are many ways to skin a cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you trust... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have some swampland in Florida to sell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's always going to be used ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, you will hardly find 4 NANDs, in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| redraw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You must expand some terms... | 01/01/70 00:00 |