| ??? 12/10/06 07:16 Read: times |
#129246 - need of the parallel port Responding to: ???'s previous message |
thank you joseph and Neil and abhishek. Andy Neil said:
As I said here: http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=129204 messing about with the parallel port really doesn't sound like a good idea when such alternatives are available! The main reason for choosing the parallel port is that, i want to load 8 bit data to the PC at an instant and i have to store these values instantly with minimum delay. but all other ports i.e. the USB, serial ports have some delays i.e. within the transmission of bits, so i have to go for parallel ports. moreover we have support in Parallel ports such as ECP, EPP modes which latch the 8 data bits fastely i.e in one cycle of operation. shankar |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| accessing the modes of parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bit off-topic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCBs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In Windows... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DCB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The hardest part of using the CP2102 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Modules | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| need of the parallel port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Misunderstanding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re-analyze your requirment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| real-time? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| latency and jitter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Inadequately specified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Figures | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This might Help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USB? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there are ways ... but be careful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bps? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By definition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What definition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at least wikipedia | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you actually read it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bits and bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Typo, of sorts. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bits vs bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even worse, do you remember | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Husker Du | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nope ...it\'s BYTES | 01/01/70 00:00 |