| ??? 06/17/05 14:24 Read: times |
#95166 - Punisment? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Nobody want to punish a honest mistake, Nobody's asking for nor giving "punishment" As I've said before, the score refers to the post, not the poster. It is just a statement of fact - the post is incorrect (because I left out the vital 'code' keyword). I would've updated the post myself, but I missed the 20-minute time window when edits are allowed. :-( Perhaps the 20-minute edit timeout should just be removed? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 |