| ??? 06/16/05 05:47 Read: times |
#95063 - in fact Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I always put constant arrays into code space but not usualy at a specific address,the arrays can be accessed very efficiently and another benifit is that you can force sdcc to skip the memcopy routine it usualy includes in the start-up function which is used t initialise xdata. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 |