| ??? 06/16/05 07:29 Read: times |
#95070 - Keil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
code at 0xfff0 unsigned char const serial_num[] = {'1', '7', '7', '6'};
which is one way you could do it in sdcc. Unfortunately not in Keil. Keil's _at_ keyword extension cannot be used with initialisers. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 |